Highlight

BONUS briefing on the final evaluation of BONUS carried out by a panel of five independent experts appointed by the European Commission is out now!

“Our overriding conclusion is that BONUS has been in many ways a great success“

Download your copy!
Briefing 30_final_evaluation
________________________________________________________

CALENDAR 2017/18 OF BONUS SYMPOSIA




BONUS VIDEOS

Learn about Baltic herring in an informative video!

Heeringas from Alyne Delaney on Vimeo.

See other BONUS videos on our YouTube channel

News from projects

06.12.2017 New publication out! BONUS GOHERR addresses the socio-cultural value of fish and fisheries

Ignatius S. and Haapasaari P. 2018: Justification theory for the analysis of the socio-cultural value of fish and fisheries: The case of Baltic salmon. Marine Policy 88: 167-173.

Read more

 

01.12.2017 THE BALTIC SEA NUTRIENTS AND CARBON REUSE CHALLENGE

BONUS RETURN: Do you have an innovation with the potential to reuse nutrients and carbon in the Baltic Sea?

Read more

 

Project blogs

29.11.2017 15:05Theoretical vs. empirical/applied approach (BONUS BALTICAPP - Race Against Eutrophication Blog) Matti Sihvonen

Hi all!

It has become apparent for me recently that there is a great dividing between theoretical and empirical/applied approaches in science. Particularly in economics this dividing seems to be very strict. This was made clear to me when I started an Advanced Econometrics course in PhD program for Economics this fall. We were told that this course is purely theoretical and if there are anyone interested more in applied side of things they may consider hard if the course is too difficult for them. We were told that particularly PhD students in so called applied sciences should probably dismiss. I decided to not to dismiss and it was a good call since so far studies have been going well, although I’m definitely an applied researcher and as such not a “real” researcher, as it was made clear to us.

Ever since I’ve been thinking about this division and classification of the researchers. In my opinion theoretical and applied sides are both rather important. It is clear that there has to be solid theory behind an applied work. But it appears equally clear that good theory is worth of nothing if there is no empirical evidence to support the theory or if there is no application for the theory. In addition, new ideas for theory development may originate form surprising empirical findings. Also, applied work may show that the theory does not hold in practice. Therefore, it seems that there is justification for both sides and those can actually benefit from each other.

Thus, it seems rather counterintuitive that theoretical researchers don’t give much appreciation for applied researchers. In econometrics and statistics this might have something to do with the fact that the methods are often applied in a bad manner and important theoretical aspects are ignored. If theoretical researcher reads such empirical paper that is published in a journal, it is understandable that the theoretical researcher becomes upset and feels that his/hers work is not understood.

In many cases and in many papers statistics are done wrong. The problem might be that statistical and econometrics courses are typically either strictly theoretical or strictly applied. Then we learn advanced theoretical things in one course and some examples and some coding on another course. The problem is that the connection between theory and the empirical application might be left incomplete, to say at least. For example, in our Advanced Econometrics course we struggle mostly with the proofs of the theorems. We have learned how to derive distributions of the test statistics and to show the asymptotic consistency of the parameter. But how to apply these learnings with the real data? In the other hand, I took another course that was purely applied. There we were given some data and some codes and examples, but the theory behind the examples was not discussed at all. A good course would really combine these two worlds, because clearly those are not separate.

I don’t how is the situation in other fields, but at least in Economics I see an opportunity for improvement in how theoretical and applied sides of science should be thought. This would narrow the gap between the field work and work that is done in theory labs. It would probably decrease the hatred between the deputies of the sides. Also the books should entertain the theoretical justifications and empirical applications to really show the students/researchers how the theory is applied correctly to real data.

Best regards, Matti Sihvonen

Read more | 0 Comments

 

27.11.2017 11:07New COCOA publication (Sources & Sinks: A Tale of Coastal Biogeochemistry - BONUS COCOA) Dana Hellemann

A new study from BONUS COCOA has lately been published:

Myself and co-workers measured the removal of riverine nitrate via the processes denitrification and anammox in the sandy and muddy sediments of the oligotrophic Öre Estuary at the Swedish coast of the Quark Strait, Northern Baltic Sea. Estuaries are generally assumed to be sinks of the land-derived, riverine load of nutrients and organic matter and thus hotspots of the "coastal filter". We found that the Öre Estuary gradually removes most of the riverine nitrate long after peak loading, after temporary "trapping" in phytoplankton biomass. Read the full story here:

Hellemann D, Tallberg P, Bartl I, Voss M, Hietanen S (2017) Denitrification in an oligotrophic estuary: a delayed sink for riverine nitrate. Marine Ecology Progress Series 583:63-80. http://www.int-res.com/articles/meps_oa/m583p063.pdf

ÖRE_3_2017
Happy sampling of the Öre Estuary with R/V Lotty from the Umeå Marine Science Centre, Norrbyn.

Read more | 0 Comments

 

Watch the BONUS video



Strategic research agenda

BONUS SRA
Developed together with over 800 stakeholders across the Baltic Sea region, this serves as the backbone of the BONUS programme.


Projects

Copyright Shutterstock
Find out more about projects funded from BONUS calls open 2012-2015, as well as BONUS+ pilot projects implemented 2009-2011.


Participants

Copyright FIMR, IL
Find out more about implementing BONUS projects, including scientific and financial management and other information. 

Read more

Young scientists

Hugh Kearns at YSC2017
Previous BONUS Young Scientist Club convened on 12 June 2017 at the 11th BSSC in Rostock, Germany. 

Read more



Events

Brussels_2015



In horizon: The tenth anniversary of BONUS, the eleventh Baltic Sea Science Congress and the sixth BONUS Young Scientist Club...

Read more

Publications

BONUS publications
BONUS reports, newsletter, briefings, brochure and other can be obtained in soft copy downloads or in hard copy by post.


Call information

Copyright Rodeo
A total of 21 proposal worth EUR 9 million are competing for funding available in the BONUS call 2017: Synthesis

Read more